Influence of the tumor site and histopathology after resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. A single center experience / Influencia del origen e histopatología tumoral tras la resección de metástasis hepáticas de origen no colorrectal no neuroendocrino. Experiencia unicéntrica

Introduction: It remains unclear whether liver resection is justified in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM). A single-center study was conducted to analyse overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and potential prognostic factors in patients with different types of NCNNLM. Method: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent liver resection of NCNNLM from January 2006 to July 2019 was performed. Results: A total of 62 patients were analyzed. 82.3% presented metachronous metastases and 74.2% were unilobar. The most frequent primary tumor site (PTS) were breast (24.2%), urinary tract (19.4%), melanoma (12.9%), and pancreas (9.7%). The most frequent primary tumor pathologies were breast carcinoma (24.2%), non-breast adenocarcinoma (21%), melanoma (12.9%) and sarcoma (12.9%). The most frequent surgical procedure performed was minor hepatectomy (72.6%). R0 resection was achieved in 79.5% of cases. The major complications’ rate was 9.7% with a 90-day mortality rate of 1.6%. The 1, 3 and 5-year OS/DFS rate were 65%/28%, 45%/36% and 46%/28%, respectively. We identified the response to neoadjuvant therapy and PTS as possible prognostic factors for OS (P =0.06) and DFS (P =0.06) respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results of our series, NCNNLM resection produces beneficial outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. PTS and the response to neoadjuvant therapy could be the main prognostic factors after resection. (AU)

Introducción: No está totalmente aclarado si la resección hepática está justificada en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas no colorrectales no neuroendocrinas (MHNCNN). Hemos realizado un estudio en un solo centro para analizar la supervivencia global (SG), la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (SLE) y posibles factores pronósticos en pacientes con diferentes tipos de MHNCNN. Método: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de todos los pacientes que se sometieron a resección hepática de MHNCNN desde enero de 2006 hasta julio de 2019. Resultados: Se analizaron un total de 62 pacientes. El 82,3% presentó metástasis metacrónicas y el 74,2% fueron unilobares. El sitio original del tumor primario (STP) más frecuente fue mama (24,2%), tracto urinario (19,4%), melanoma (12,9%) y páncreas (9,7%). Las histopatologías tumorales primarias más frecuentes fueron el carcinoma de mama (24,2%), el adenocarcinoma no mamario (21%), el melanoma (12,9%) y el sarcoma (12,9%). El procedimiento quirúrgico realizado con mayor frecuencia fue la hepatectomía menor (72,6%). La resección R0 se logró en el 79,5% de los casos. La tasa de complicaciones mayores fue del 9,7% con una tasa de mortalidad a los 90 días del 1,6%. La tasa de SG / SLE a 1, 3 y 5 años fue de 65% / 28%, 45% / 36% y 46% / 28%, respectivamente. Identificamos la respuesta a la terapia neoadyuvante y el STP como posibles factores pronósticos de SG (p = 0,06) y SLE (p = 0,06) respectivamente. Conclusión: Según los resultados de nuestra serie, la resección de MHNCNN produce resultados beneficiosos en términos de SG y SLE. El STP y la respuesta a la terapia neoadyuvante podrían ser los principales factores pronósticos tras la resección. (AU)

Influence of the tumor site and histopathology after resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. A single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: It remains unclear whether liver resection is justified in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM). A single-center study was conducted to analyse overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and potential prognostic factors in patients with different types of NCNNLM. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent liver resection of NCNNLM from January 2006 to July 2019 was performed. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were analyzed. 82.3% presented metachronous metastases and 74.2% were unilobar. The most frequent primary tumor site (PTS) were breast (24.2%), urinary tract (19.4%), melanoma (12.9%), and pancreas (9.7%). The most frequent primary tumor pathologies were breast carcinoma (24.2%), non-breast adenocarcinoma (21%), melanoma (12.9%) and sarcoma (12.9%). The most frequent surgical procedure performed was minor hepatectomy (72.6%). R0 resection was achieved in 79.5% of cases. The major complications' rate was 9.7% with a 90-day mortality rate of 1.6%. The 1, 3 and 5-year OS/DFS rate were 65%/28%, 45%/36% and 46%/28%, respectively. We identified the response to neoadjuvant therapy and PTS as possible prognostic factors for OS (P =0.06) and DFS (P =0.06) respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our series, NCNNLM resection produces beneficial outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. PTS and the response to neoadjuvant therapy could be the main prognostic factors after resection.

Prognostic value of pre-operative systemic immune-inflammation index and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian origin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on the survival outcomes of patients who underwent to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases following surgery at our department between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used with Youden index to calculate the optimal cutoff values for SII, PLR and NLR. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that high preoperative values of SII, PLR and NLR were correlated with worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. In the multivariable analysis, high SII was recognized as an independent prognostic factor for OS (CI 95%: 0.002- 3.835, p = 0.097) and high PLR was recognized as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (CI 95%: 0.253-2.248, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: SII and PLR could be useful prognostic tools to predict outcomes of patients who underwent to CRS and HIPEC for ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis.